wifiasebo.blogg.se

Parallels vs virtualbox
Parallels vs virtualbox









parallels vs virtualbox parallels vs virtualbox
  1. #Parallels vs virtualbox install
  2. #Parallels vs virtualbox iso

Parallels is the clear undisputed winner of outright performance in a VM as of today's testing. "Ladies and Gentleman, we simply cannot let this bitch slapping VM continue. Parallels 4.0 = Time measured to power up the VM, hit Windows Update, grab everything there including those damned language packs = 22 mins till the rebootįusion 3 = Time measured to power up the VM, hit Windows Update, grab everything there including those damned language packs = 43 mins till the reboot "Parallels continues the amazing and near complete domination of Fusion 3 as we continue." HDTune 3.50 under Fusion 3 = average read speed of 47MB/s HDTune 3.50 under Parallels 4.0 = average read speed of 68MB/s "Parallels kicks the living shit outta Fusion, who's down for the count.

#Parallels vs virtualbox install

Parallels 4.0 = 18 minutes to install Windows 7 from the time I started the VM to the time I got to the usable Desktopįusion 3 = 33 minutes to install Windows 7 from the time I started the VM to the time I got to the usable Desktop Western Digital 640GB Black, OSX Leopard 10.5.8 installed, working perfectly in the first 100GB of space, the rest is empty presently, all testing done on the system partition using defaults for both VM applications, EVGA Nvidia GeForce 9500GT 1GB CI/QE supported, 22" LCD at 1680x1050 - virtual machines were totally at default 'easy configure/install' settings.

#Parallels vs virtualbox iso

Did a clean install of Parallels 4.0 and VMWare Fusion 3 yesterday on a Hackintosh (please, spare me as it'll stomp the crap out of "real" Macs anyday with a similar config) and then installed Windows 7 from an ISO on the hard drive.











Parallels vs virtualbox